Forum Rules, Notifications and Helpful Hints

Explore the community of craft distillers and discover the largest professional association dedicated to the art and science of craft distillation. ACE DISTILLER has been serving all levels, from novice enthusiasts to seasoned professionals, in the craft distilling industry since 2010.

Home Forums Equipment Thermometer designed for use in hazardous environments

  • Thermometer designed for use in hazardous environments

    Posted by seventh son on January 15, 2020 at 4:32 pm

    I need to add a couple temperature probes into the vapor path in my distillation column. I’m looking for a simple stand-alone thermometer to plug the probes into so that I don’t have to rebuild my control panel. I’m having trouble finding an intrinsically safe thermometer. The question is…does it have to be intrinsically safe, or can it be a standard thermometer?

    seventh son replied 4 years, 11 months ago 3 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • silk city distillers

    Member
    January 15, 2020 at 6:47 pm

    RTD probes are considered intrinsically safe if they are connected to an intrinsically safe meter or controller.  If your meter is not, you can use an intrinsic Safety Barrier for RTD, which is a stand-alone module that both will connect to, such as:

    https://www.pepperl-fuchs.com/usa/en/classid_14.htm?view=productdetails&prodid=870#functions

    This is getting into fairly sophisticated electronics design and safety engineering. What I am saying is that if your AHJ is indicating this is an issue, the necessary certifications are likely more important than the individual circuit components.

    This kind of stuff is far more complex than a typical inspector would understand.  You would likely lose them at Intrinsically Safe.

    Keep in mind what you are protecting against.  The temperature probe is not the problem, it’s that if something goes very wrong in the controller, and the rtd is now exposed to enough voltage/current – that short circuit could create an ignition source.  The goal of that barrier is to protect the probe and wiring from anything that might go wrong in that box.

  • richard1

    Member
    January 15, 2020 at 7:44 pm

    I have recently gone through this exercise.  I have 7 temperature probes in my boiler and column and had initially designed on standard PT100’s with 4-20mA PUKS and this all feeding into my PLC.

     

    With peer review it was suggested to not bugger around and rather do it properly with Ex requirements.  The cost of this is obviously huge especially if you consider additional level switches and pressure transmitters also both with Ex requirements.

     

    So for temperature, I have used Ex rated 4-20mA PUKS as well as Ex rated 4-20mA isolation barriers.  In hind sight I wish I had gone the route as Silk has mentioned, RTD’s with Ex isolation barriers.

     

    But what gets me is that not everyone does this.  Some still suppliers offer this as an optional extra.

  • seventh son

    Member
    January 15, 2020 at 8:33 pm

    Thanks for the reply. It’s not an AHJ issue, I just want to be sure that my still is operating safely. 

    Someone suggested to me that simply adding a thermowell would solve the problem, but I am still skeptical. If a short in the controller leads to the thermocouple, I don’t see how the thermowell would provide a barrier. 

Log in to reply.

en_USEnglish